Loading...

Top
PFQ Banner

This is PokéFarm Q, a free online Pokémon collectables game.

Already a user? New to PFQ?

Single post in Daycare Update 2024 plans

Forum Index > Core > Announcements > Daycare Update 2024 plans >

Leacky's AvatarLeacky
Leacky's Avatar
I really think Niet should do a few Melan hunts to get the feel of them. That way he could understand better how the hunting Players feel about this update. I know the V Wave part of the update was scrapped (thank Arceus!) but no sane Melan hunter would change their pairs (or entire hunts) on a daily basis. And keeping 18 pairs of a single species - God please no! I have all breedable pairs with a perfect base compatibility - that's already 29 Fields! Do you really expect people to keep multiple pairs for a single hunt? Aside from the fact that it's simply not possible due to the space limit where would I keep my Specials collection? Or Specials for sale? Or really just anything that isn't a breeding pair? And speaking of them - I really prefer the current pair making system. The way you described it in the first post may seem complex... but for the most part it really isn't. Just get 2 Pokemon from the same evo line and of opposite gender from 2 other people and bam - you have a 90%+ Breeding Pair. The mono- and genderless Pokemon are similar, just with a lower base compatibility, as long as you follow these tables. It's pretty straight-forward. But the new system starts with a lower max base compatibility, will be affected by so many factors (natures, evo stage, split evos, multiple formes, types etc) - all that just sounds needlessly complicated and convoluted to me. Sorry if this sounded rude, I just really don't know how to express this better. I'd really rather keep the current system that I know and understand as-is than having to rebuild my entire collection from scratch because it won't be optimal anymore. None of my pairs have matching Natures. Some of my pairs are kept at different evo stages on purpose so the mono-gender Pokemon linked to them can have the max compatibility. And Unowns - some of my pairs are completely screwed because they have the same OT because of this little quirk - "Two Unown receive a base value of a random number between 30 and 60, regardless of OT". Edit: fixed a few typos Edit 2: And I forgot one more thing - under the current system once made the pairs are set in stone and thus reliable. Something that can't be said about the new way too dynamic system.
Credits: *Image of Purple Glaceon used with permission* *Avatar is an official Glaceon sprite from Pokemon Conquest*
I'm back! *My new Shop*
© PokéFarm 2009-2024 (Full details)Contact | Rules | Privacy | Reviews 4.6★Get shortlink for this page